Skip to main content
Log in

Knowledge and use of fungi by a mycophilic society of the Venezuelan Amazon

Conocimiento y Uso de Hongos de una Sociedad Micófila del Amazonas Venzolano

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on the knowledge and useful applications of various fungi by the Hotï, a recently contacted Native American society inhabiting the Sierra Maigualida region of the Venezuelan Amazon. At least 31 folk taxa of fungi are esteemed as sources of nutrition, powerful media for hunting magic, protective charms against black magic, human medicinal agents, or body adornments. Even though the results presented here probably do not exhaust the total number of species known and used by them, they nevertheless suggest that the Hotï constitute one of the rare mycophilic societies in the Venezuelan Amazon. Further research is needed in order to obtain a more complete picture of the complexity of humanfungi relationships in this society.

Résumé

La investigación etnomicológica en la tierras bajas amazónicas suramericanas es notablemente escasa. La gran mayoría de los estudios disponibles acerca del conocimiento y las prácticas etnobiológicos de los grupos étnicos locales de esta región no incluyen a los hongos, o bien, señalan que estos no tienen valor económico, o son alucinógenos o peligrosos para el consumo humano. Este trabajo reporta sobre el conocimiento y usos dados a varios hongos por parte de los Hotï, un grupo de indígenas suramericanos recientemente contactados que ocupan la Sierra de Maigualida del Amazonas venezolano. Los Hotï consideran al menos 31 taxa de hongos estimados como fuentes de alimentos, poderosos medios de cacería, protectores contra la magia negra, agentes medicinales o bien como adornos corporales. Los datos presentados aquí sugieren que los Hotï constituyen una de las pocas y raras sociedades micófilas en el Amazonas venezolano, pese a que los resultados analizados no agotan el número total de especies conocidas y usadas por ellos. Es necesario profundizar la investigación para alcanzar una idea más completa de la complejidad de las relaciones hombres-hongos en este grupo étnico.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Balée, W. 1994. Footprints of the forest. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B. 1992. Ethnobiological classification. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchette, R. 1997. Haploporus odorus: A sacred fungus in traditional Native American culture of the northern plains. Mycologia 89:233–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2001. Fungus ashes and tobacco: The use of Phellinus igniarius by the indigenous people of North America. Mycologist 15:4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. 1946. The Araucanians. Page 702 in J. Steward, ed., Handbook of South American Indians. Vol. 2: The Andean civilization. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 143. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Avila A., A. L. Weiden, andG. Guzman. 1980. Notes on the ethnomycology of Hueyapan, Morelos, Mexico. Journal of Ethno-Pharmacology 2: 311–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Civrieux, M. 1973. Clasificación zoológica y botánica entre los Makiritare y los Kariña. Antropológica 36:3–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delascio Chitty, F. 1992. Vegetación y etnobotánica del Valle de Culebra (Mawadianejödo), Estado Amazonas, Venezuela. Acta Terramaris 5:1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R. M. W., and A. Y. Aikhenvald. 1999. The Amazonian languages. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, D. 1983. Nutrition in the northwest Amazon: Household dietary intake and time-energy expenditure. Pages 329–335 in R. Hames and W. Vickers, eds., Adaptive responses of native Amazonians. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidalgo, O. 1965. Conhecimento micológico dos índios brasileiros. Rickia 2:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1968. Conhecimento micológico dos índios brasileiros. Revista de Antropología 15–16:27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,and G. Prance. 1976. The ethnomycology of the Sanema Indians. Mycologia 68:201–210.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —,and J. M. Hirata. 1979. Etnomicología Caiabi, Txicão e Txucarramãe. Rickia 8:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkers, J. 1986. Los Yanomami y su Sistema Alimenticio. Vicariato Apostólico Monografía [Puerto Ayacucho, Venezuela] No. 2.

  • Franck, A. G., and F. R. Radcliffe. 1957. Food from fungi. Economic Botany 11:126–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, J. 1982. Notas sobre la etnomicologia nahuatl. Boletin de la Sociedad Mexicana de Micología 17:181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazlett, D. L. 1986. Ethnobotanical observations from Cabecar and Guaymí settlements in Central America. Economic Botany 40:339–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawksworth, D. L. 1991. The fungal dimension of biodiversity: Magnitude, significance, and conservation. Mycological Research 95:641–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, O., and C. Alarcón. 1988. Mapa de vegetación de Venezuela. 1:2.000.000. Ministerio del Ambiente y de los Recursos Naturales Renovables and The Nature Conservancy. Caracas, Venezuela.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunn, E., D. Acuca Vásquez, and H. León Avendaño. 2001. Where do fungi fit? Working paper. http://faculty.washington.edu/hunn/Fungi_fit.htm. May 2001.

  • Iturriaga, T., G. Cuenca, and O. Holmquist. 1991. Papel de los hongos en el Amazonas. Pages 72–86 in K. Jaffe and P. Sánchez, eds., Tecnologías alternativas en el uso y conservación de bosques tropicales. Fundación Terramar y Universidad Simón Bolívar, Caracas, Venezuela.

    Google Scholar 

  • Læssøe, R. 1998. Mushrooms. Eyewitness Handbooks, Dorling Kindersley Book, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levetin, E., and K. McMahon. 1996. Plants and society. Win. C. Brown Publishers, Dubuque, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. 1950. Use of wild plants. Page 481 in J. Steward, ed., Handbook of South American Indians. Vol. 6: Physical anthropology, linguistics and cultural geography of South American Indians. Bureau of American Ethnology. Bulletin 143. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.

  • Mapes C., G. Guzmán, and J. Caballero. 1981. Etnomicologia purepeche. El concimiento y uso de los hongos en la cuenca del Lago de Patzcuaro, Michoacán. Serie Etnociencia, Cuadernos de Etnobiología. Vol. 2. Direccion General De Culturas Populares, México, D.F., Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • MARNR-ORSTOM. 1988. Atlas del inventario de tierras del Territorio Federal Amazonas. MARNR-DGSIIA, Caracas, Venezuela.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, W., and B. Albert. 1996. The use of medicinal plants by Yanomami Indians of Brazil. Economic Botany 50:10–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Fuentes, A., E. Aguirre-Acosta, Villegas, and M. J. Cifuentes. 1994. Fungistic survey of the macromycetes from Bocoyna, Chihuahua, Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Micologia 10:63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,J. Cifuentes, R. Bye, and R. Valenzuela. 1996. Kute-mo’ko-a: An edible mushroom of the Raramuri Indians of Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Micología 12:31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, N. C, and R. V. Morey. 1980. Los Sáliva. Pages 241–306 in W. Coppens, ed., Los aborígenes de Venezuela. Vol. 1. Fundación La Salle de Ciéncias Naturales, Instituto Caribe de Antropología y Sociología, Caracas, Venezuela.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, B. 2000. The pragmatics of folk classification. Pages 69–87 in P. E. Minnis, ed., Ethnobotany: A reader. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, J. 1994. http://www.maps.org/news-letters/v05n3/ 05333tel.html

  • Parent, G., and D. Thoen. 1978. Food value of edible mushrooms from Upper-Shabu region. Economic Botany 31:436–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posey, D. A., and W. L. Overal, eds. 1990. Ethno-biology: Implications and applications. Vols. 1 and 2. Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Belem, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prance, G. 1972. An ethnobotanical comparison of four tribes of Amazonian Indians. Acta Amazônica 2(2):7–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1984. The use of edible fungi by Amazonian Indians. Advances in Economic Botany 1:127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, G. 1997 The forgotten kingdom: Mushrooms and ethnobiology. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association Meetings, Atlanta, GA. Manuscript, 16 pp.

  • Shepard, G.. 1998. Gift of the Haroy Eagle, hunting medicines of the Machiguenga. South American Explorer 51: 9–11, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, G., and D. Arora. 1992. The grace of the flood: mushrooms and the Highland Maya of Chiapas. Paper presented at the III Congress of the International Society for Ethnobiology, Mexico City. Manuscript, 17 pp.

  • Timbrook, J. 1990. Ethnobotany of the Chumash Indians, California, based on collections by John P. Harrington. Economic Botany 44(2):236–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, N. J. 2000. General plant categories in Thompson (Nlaka’pamux) and Lillooet (Stl’atl’imx), Two interior Salish languages of British Columbia. Pages 88–117 in P. E. Minnis, ed., Ethnobotany: A reader. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasson, R. G. 1961. The hallucinogenic fungi of Mexico: An inquiry into the origins of the religious idea among primitive peoples. Harvard University, Botanical Museum Leaflets 19:137–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1968. Soma divine mushroom of immortality. Harcourt, Brace and World, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1995. Ethnomycology: discoveries about Amanita muscaria point to fresh perspectives. Pages 385–390 in R. Evans Schultes and S. von Reis, eds., Ethnobotany: Evolution of a discipline. Dioscorides Press, Portland, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbert, W. 1992. Bush-spirits encounters in Warao life and lore. Antropológica 77:63–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zent, E. L. 1999. Etnobotánica Hotï: Explorando las interacciones entre las plantas y el ser humano en el Amazonas Venezolano. Doctoral thesis, University of Georgia, Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • ---,and S. Zent. 2001. Floristic composition of four forest plots: Sierra Maigualida, Venezuelan Guayana. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Zent, S. 1992. Historical and ethnographic ecology of the Upper Cuao River: Clues for an interpretation of native Guianese social organization. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,E. L. Zent, and L. Marius. 2001. Informe final del Proyecto de Investigación S1-96000554 “Etnobotánica quantitativa de los indígenas Hotï de la región Circum-Maigualida, Estados Amazonas y Bolívar, Venezuela.” Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Altos de Pipe, Venezuela.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zent, E.L., Zent, S. & Iturriaga, T. Knowledge and use of fungi by a mycophilic society of the Venezuelan Amazon. Econ Bot 58, 214–226 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2004)058[0214:KAUOFB]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2004)058[0214:KAUOFB]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Navigation